![]() |
St James and Moe at the dinner table |
The concept of keeping wild animals as pets in a domesticated home has been a topic of argument for many centuries, and rightly so. The incredible creatures are not pets, they are not bred to live amongst humans, they are not (despite some beliefs) docile animals, Moe included. At the age of 30, in 1998 Moe Davise,now having broad shoulders, thick black fur, strong arms, and powerful sharp fangs dented a police car, scratched animal control agents and injured a police officers hand before he could be caught and contained - this supposedly amiable Primate began to show the strain of being kept in what was essentially captivity for three decades.
![]() |
Moe with the Davises on their wedding day. He was the ring bearer. |
On March 3rd 2005, St James and LaDonna were visiting Moe for his 39th birthday - they were able to visit him whenever they desired. The owners of the Ranch already cared for seven primates, none of whom had regular visitors, this attention and love for the animals was rare. Out of the corner of her eye LaDonna saw an escaped male Chimpanzee, who stared at her before attacking her and tearing off her thumb. As St James tried to protect his wife, another Chimpanzee approached and together the two Primates brutally maimed Mr Davise. They bit into his skull, gouged out his eye and chewed off his nose, mouth and teeth leaving a gaping hole. They ripped off the skin on one side of his face and devoured three fingers on his hand. Although St James survived, his life is arguably unlivable. His wife if his carer every minute of the day, he cannot wash himself, go to the toilet, or eat without LaDonna's help, barely able to utter a sound from his mutilated mouth.
![]() |
St James and LaDonna after the attack. |
This tragedy is only one example of the effect of keeping wild animals in captivity. The strain will eventually consume them, causing them to lash out. Whilst Moe was not the cause of these injuries, he also displayed tendencies relating to the stress of being kept away from him natural habitat and his instinct to be free. The adoption of Primates as domesticated pets is illegal for good reason, as the Jane Goodall Institute suggests "Aggression is a natural aspect of chimpanzee behavior,
they have a need for constant mental stimulation, which - if disrupted -
can lead to outbreaks of violence".
Whilst
the stimulus for aggression in Chimpanzees towards humans is often the way they
are treated, or kept, it has been said that male chimps in particular are
genetically violent, once again reinforcing the idea that the animals should
not be kept by humans. Despite St James and LaDonna believing that that their
human upbringing for Moe would domesticate him, this concept proposed by Dr
Jane Goodall would suggest that regardless of his upbringing, the unpredictable
nature of Chimpanzees means they never have been and never will be safe to live
with humans.
In the
wild, there is a reasonable and scientific explanation to this seemingly
'random' aggression. The more aggressive a male chimpanzee, the more likely he
is to father offspring. In Chimpanzee mating season, the female Chimps will
often mate with the entire group of males Chimps in order to provide
uncertainty as to who the father of the offspring is. Just as in humans, the
male Chimpanzees become frustrated with this uncertainty and try to assert
their dominance. Wanting to protect their female and persuade her not to mate
with another Chimp to prevent this uncertainty, the male becomes aggressive to
prove his dominance over the other Chimps, allowing them to regain a certain
degree of control over the females mating. However when placed in a human
environment, this aggression appears random.
One may
say that LaDonna and St James's treatment of Moe was delusional. Forcing him
into human activities such as writing his name, dressing him in sailor outfits
and keeping him from his own species - surely this is animal cruelty? However
those who know them best persist that their actions were those of pure love,
and Moe - a wild animal - was perfectly content being ridiculed.
Whilst
the debate over the domestication of Primates continue, I personally cannot
help but wonder how a human could consider removing an animal from its natural
habitat, not allowing it any contact with its species and trying to pretend
that it is in fact a human, acts of love.
No comments:
Post a Comment